Official compatibility: Odoo 11 will be the first LTS release to introduce Python 3 compatibility, starting with Python 3.5. It will also be the first LTS release to drop official support for Python 2.
Rationale: Python 3 has been around since 2008, and all Python libraries used by the official Odoo distribution have been ported and are considered stable. Most supported platforms have a Python 3.5 package, or a similar way to deploy it. Preserving dual compatibility is therefore considered unnecessary, and would represent a significant overhead in testing for the lifetime of Odoo 11.
Python 2 and Python 3 are somewhat different language, but following backports, forward ports and cross-compatibility library it is possible to use a subset of Python 2 and Python 3 in order to have a system compatible with both.
Here are a few useful steps or reminders to make Python 2 code compatible with Python 3.
Важно
This is not a general-purpose guide for porting Python 2 to Python 3, it’s a guide to write 2/3-compatible Odoo code. It does not go through all the changes in Python but rather through issues which have been found in the standard Odoo distribution in order to show how to evolve such code such that it works on both Python 2 and Python 3.
References/useful documents:
- What’s new in Python 3? covers many of the changes between Python 2 and Python 3, though it is missing a number of changes which were backported to Python 2.7 as well as some feature reintroductions of later Python 3 revisions
- How do I port to Python 3?
- Python-Future
- Porting Python 2 code to Python 3
- Porting to Python 3: A Guide (a bit outdated but useful for the extensive comments on strings and IO)
Versions Support
A cross compatible Odoo would only support Python 2.7 and Python 3.5 and above: Python 2.7 backported some Python 3 features, and Python 2 features were reintroduced in various Python 3 in order to make conversion easier. Python 3.6 adds great features (f-strings, …) and performance improvements (ordered compact dicts) but does not seem to reintroduce compatibility features whereas:
- Python 3.5 reintroduced
%
for bytes/bytestrings (PEP 461) - Python 3.4 has no specific compatibility improvement but is the lowest P3 version for PyLint
- Python 3.3 reintroduced the «u» prefix for proper (unicode) strings
- Python 3.2 made
range
views more list-like (backported to 2.7)and reintroducedcallable
Предупреждение
While Python 3 adds plenty of great features (keyword-only parameters, generator delegation, pathlib, …), you must not use them in Odoo until Python 2 support is dropped
Примечание
In the very rare cases where you need to differentiate between
Python 2 and Python 3, use the odoo.tools.pycompat.PY2
flag.
Semantics changes
Dict & set iteration order («Hash Randomisation»)
In Python 2, the iteration order depends on the value’s hash (modulo the
collection’s capacity and conflict resolution), which provides a
spec-undefined but implementation-defined order. While that’s not supposed to
happen, it turns out code may depend on the specific order of iteration over
a hash collection (dict
or set
).
Python 3.3 enables hash randomisation by default (this can be optionally
enabled on previous versions including Python 2 by providing the -R
command-line parameter), which means the order of iteration changes from one
run to the next.
When discovered, this can be fixed by one of:
- making iteration steps properly independent (removing the dependency of order of iteration)
- using different checking method (e.g. when serialising sets or dictionaries and checking against the specific serialised value)
- fixing dependencies
- using a
collections.OrderedDict
orodoo.tools.misc.OrderedSet
instead of a regular one, they guarantee order of iteration is order of insertion - sorting the collection’s items before iterating over them (this may require adding some sort of iteration key to the items)
Moved and removed
Standard Library Modules
Python 3 reorganised, moved or removed a number of modules in the standard library:
StringIO
andcStringIO
were removed, you can useio.BytesIO
andio.StringIO
to replace them in a cross-version manner (io.BytesIO
for binary data,io.StringIO
for text/unicode data).urllib
,urllib2
andurlparse
were redistributed acrossurllib.parse
andurllib.request
.Since requests and werkzeug are already hard dependencies of Odoo, replace
urllib[2].urlopen
/urllib2.Request
uses by requests, andurlparse
and a few utilty functions (urllib.quote
,urllib.urlencode
) are available throughwerkzeug.urls
, a backport of Python 3’surllib.parse
.Предупреждение
requests does not raise by default on non-200 responses
cgi.escape
(HTML escaping) is deprecated in Python 3, prefer Odoo’s ownodoo.tools.misc.html_encode()
.- Most of
types
’s content has been stripped out in Python 3: only «internal» interpreter types (e.g. CodeType, FrameType, …) have been left in, other types can be obtained directly from the corresponding builtin or by getting thetype()
of a literal value.
Absolute Imports (PEP 328)
Важно
In Python 3, import foo
can only import from a «top-level» library
(absolute path). If trying to import a sibling or sub-module you must
use an explicitly relative import e.g. from . import foo
or
from .foo import bar
.
In Python 2 import
statements are ambiguous: if a file a.py
contains
import b
, the import system will first check if there’s a b.py
file
next to it before checking if there is a package called that on the
PYTHONPATH.
Furthermore if a sibling file is named the same as top-level package, the
library becomes inaccessible to both the file itself ans siblings, this has
actually happened in Odoo with odoo.tools.mimetypes
.
Additionally, relative imports allow navigating «up» the tree by using
multiple leading .
.
Примечание
Explicitly relative imports are always available in Python 2, and should be used everywhere.
You can ensure you are not using any implicitly relative import by adding
from __future__ import absolute_import
at the top of your files, or by
running the relative-import
PyLint.
Exception Handlers
Важно
All exception handlers must be converted to except ... as ..
. Valid
forms are:
except Exception:
except (Exception1, ...):
except Exception as name:
except (Exception1, ...) as name:
In Python 2, except
statements are of the form:
except Exception[, name]:
or:
except (Exception1, Exception2)[, name]:
But because the name is optional, this gets confusing and people can stumble into the first form when trying for the second and write:
except Exception1, Exception:
which will not yield the expected result.
Python 3 changes this syntax to:
except Exception[ as name]:
or:
except (Exception1, Exception2)[ as name]:
This form was implemented in Python 2.5 and is thus compatible across the board.
Operators & keywords
Важно
The backtick operator `foo`
must be converted to an
explicit call to the repr()
builtin
Важно
The <>
operator must be replaced by !=
These two operators were long recommended against/deprecated in Python 2, Python 3 removed them from the language.
Важно
exec
is now a builtin
In Python 2, exec
is a statement/keyword. Much like print
, it’s been
converted to a builtin function in Python 3. However because the Python 2
version can take a tuple parameter it is easy to convert the odd exec
statement to the following cross-language forms:
exec(source)
exec(source, globals)
exec(source, globals, locals)
List/iteration builtins and methods
In Python 3, a number of builtins and methods formerly returning lists were converted to return iterators or views, with the corresponding redundant methods or functions having been removed entirely:
In Python 3,
map
,filter
andzip
return iterators,itertools.imap
,itertools.ifilter
anditertools.izip
have been removed.Важно
When possible, use comprehensions (list, generator, …) rather than
map
orfilter
.In Python 3,
dict.keys
,dict.values
anddict.items
return views rather than lists, and theiter*
andview*
methods have been removed.Важно
When the result of the above methods is used for more than a one-shot loop (e.g. to be included in returned value), or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, wrap the calls in a
list()
.
builtins
cmp
The cmp
builtin function has been removed from Python 3.
- Most of its uses are in
cmp=
parameters to sort functions where it can usually be replaced by a key function. - Other uses found were obtaining the sign of an item (
cmp(item, 0)
), this can be replicated using the standard library’smath.copysign
e.g.math.copysign(1, item)
will return1.0
ifitem
is positive and-1.0
ifitem
is negative.
execfile
execfile(path)
has been removed completely from Python 3 but it is
trivially replaceable in all cases by:
exec(open(path, 'rb').open())
of a variant thereof (see exec changes for details)
file
The file
builtin has been removed in Python 3. Generally, it can just
be replaced by the open
builtin, although you may want to use io.open
which is more flexible and better handles the binary/text dichotomy,
a big issue in cross-version Python.
Примечание
In Python 3, the open
builtin is actually an alias for io.open
.
long
In Python 2, integers can be either int
or long
. Python 3 unifies this
under the single int
type.
Важно
- the
L
suffix for integer literals must be removed - calls to
long
must be replaced by calls toint
(int, long)
for type-checking purposes must be replaced byodoo.tools.pycompat.integer_types
- the
L
suffix on numbers is unsupported in Python 3, and unnecessary in Python 2 as «overflowing» integer literals will implicitly instantiate long. - in Python 2, a call to
int()
will implicitly create along
object if necessary. type-testing is the last and bigger issue as in Python 2
long
is not a subtype ofint
(nor the reverse), andisinstance(value, (int, long))
is thus generally necessary to catch all integrals.For that case, Odoo 11 now provides a compatibility module with an
integer_types
definition which can be used for type-testing.It is a tuple of types so when used with
isinstance
it can be provided directly or inside an other tuple alongside other types e.g.isinstance(value, (BaseModel, integer_types))
.However when used with
type
directly (which should be avoided) you should use thein
operator, and if you need other types you need to concatenateinteger_types
to an other tuple.
reduce
In Python 3, reduce
has been demoted from builtin to functools.reduce
.
However this is because most uses of ``reduce`` can be replaced by ``sum``,
``all``, ``any`` or a list comprehension for a more readable and faster
result.
It is easy enough to just add from functools import reduce
to the file
and compatible with Python 2.6 and later, but consider whether you get better
code by replacing it with some other method altogether.
xrange
In Python 3, range()
behaves the same as Python 2’s xrange
.
For cross-version code, you can just use range()
everywhere: while this
will incur a slight allocation cost on Python 2, Python 3’s range
supports
the entire Sequence protocol and thus behaves very much like a regular
list or tuple.
Removed/renamed methods
Важно
- the
has_key
method on dicts must be replaced by use of thein
operator e.g.foo.has_key(bar)
becomesbar in foo
.
in
for dicts was introduced in Python 2.3, leading to has_key
being
redundant, and removed in Python 3.
Minor syntax changes
the ability to unpack a parameter (in the parameter declaration list) has been removed in Python 3 e.g.:
def foo((bar, baz), qux): …
is now invalid
octal literals must be prefixed by
0o
(or0O
). Following the C family, in Python 2 an octal literal simply has a leading 0, which can be confusing and easy to get wrong when e.g. padding for readability (e.g.0013
would be the decimal 11 rather than 13).In Python 3, leading zeroes followed by neither a 0 nor a period is an error, octal literals now follow the hexadecimal convention with a
0o
prefix.
Bytes/String/Text: The Big One
The most impactful Python 3 change by far is to the text model: for historical
reasons the distinction Python 2’s bytestrings (bytes
/str
) and text
strings (unicode
) is fuzzy and it will try to implicitly convert between
one and the other using the ASCII encoding.
Python 3 changes this, it removes the implicit conversions, removes APIs which contribute to the fuzz and tends to strictly segregate other to work on either bytes or text.
This is fundamentally good and mostly sensible, but it means lots of breakage:
the builtins
Python 3 removes both unicode
and basestring
, and str
now
corresponds to text strings (the old unicode
) with bytes
being
bytestrings in both languages 1.
Both versions have the following prefixes for string literals:
b'foo'
is a bytestring (bytes
object).'foo'
is that version’sstr
type, which may be either a bytestring or a text string 2.u'foo'
is that version’s text string.
For best cross-version compatibility you should avoid unprefixed string literals unless you specifically need a «native string» 2.
For easier type-testing, odoo.tools.pycompat
provides the following
constants:
string_types
is an alias/type tuple for testing string types, essentially a replacement of testing forbasestring
or(str, unicode)
.text_type
is the proper text type for the current version, it should mostly be used for converting non-bytes objects to text.bytes
should be avoided for type conversions, though it can be used to check if an object is a bytestring.
open
Важно
the open
builtin should always be explicitly used in binary mode
(rb
, wb
, …)
To read text files, use io.open
.
On both P2 and P3, open
defaults to returning native strings in default
(«text») mode, however in P3 that means it actually decodes the file’s bytes
using whatever encoding was set up (default: UTF-8) while on Python 2 it has
no concept of encoding.
Using open
in binary mode provides bytestrings on both versions and works
fine. To read text files, use io.open
and provide an explicit encoding.
base64
base64 is a bytes->bytes conversion. bytes->bytes codecs were removed from the «native» encoding/decoding system which is now exclusively for bytes<->text conversions: text is encoded to bytes and bytes are decoded to text.
Важно
both bytes.encode('base64')
and bytes.decode('base64')
must be
migrated to using base64.b64encode
and base64.b64decode
respectively.
csv
csv
is a fairly vicious one: not only is it not a very good format, the
Python 2 and Python 3 versions of the library are text-model incompatible in
significant ways:
- Python 2’s CSV only works on ascii-compatible byte streams (it has no encoding support at all) and extracts bytestring values
- Python 3’s CSV only works on text streams and extract text values
- And
io
doesn’t provide «native string» streaming facilities.
However with respect to Odoo it turns out most or all uses of csv
fit
inside a model of byte stream to and from text values.
The latter is thus a model implemented by cross-version wrappers
odoo.tools.pycompat.csv_reader()
and
odoo.tools.pycompat.csv_writer()
: they take a UTF-8 byte stream and
read or write text values.
b"foo"[0]
is b"f"
, but in Python 3 it’s 102
(the
value of the first byte), you’ll want to slice bytestrings for
compatibility.csv
module of the standard library is
one such problematic API (it is also notoriously problematic for its
terrible support of non-ascii-compatible encodings in Python 2).
email.message_from_string
is an other one.